
The next edition will be published in March
No. 312 (October 2007)
EBU Technical Review has a secure
mailing list which is used to notify list members when a new edition has been
published:
SUBSCRIBE
/// UNSUBSCRIBE
Hot
Topics |
|||
| Webcasting | |||
Download
all the PDFs from this edition in a single file (2.2 MB)
(all the articles can then be printed in one step)
| Editorial | |
| Technological
neutrality and service neutrality |
|
| Content Protection | |
| HDMI & HDCP — the manufacturers' perspective |
|
| HDTV signals offer great opportunities to broadcasters, but there is also the negative side – a high risk of piracy. In order to protect prime content against illegitimate use, content-protection mechanisms can be used. For the digital HDMI interface between an HDTV set-top box and an “HD ready” display device, HDCP technology is chosen. This is a tool that can be used at the discretion of the broadcaster who can activate it by means of a switching signal. In the case of a piracy attack, the technology offers a revocation mechanism whereby a list of revoked devices is transmitted in a safe way to the receiver, where it is stored. The availability of a content protection mechanism – being a mandatory requirement of the EICTA “HD ready” logo – does not mean that the display device always needs to be fed in a protected manner. Free-to-air signals that are transmitted in the clear are always displayed. |
|
| HDCP — the FTA broadcasters' perspective |
|
| The first HD services have now been deployed on pay-TV platforms using content-protection measures such as HDCP, in accordance with contractual obligations mandated by the production studios. Before long, free-to-air TV platforms will also become involved in HDCP. This article provides technical information on the HDCP system, which is used to protect the HDMI link from a set-top box to a display device (HDMI is the HDTV equivalent of the familiar “SCART” connector used with standard-definition television). The article also explains “what HDCP is” and “what it is not”, and outlines the views of several different European broadcasters on methods for controlling content protection. |
|
| Video Streaming | |
| Multiple Description Coding — a new technology
for video streaming over the Internet |
|
| The Internet is growing quickly as a network of heterogeneous communication networks. The number of users is rapidly expanding and bandwidth-hungry services, such as video streaming, are becoming more and more popular by the day. However, heterogeneity and congestion cause three main problems: unpredictable throughput, losses and delays. The challenge is therefore to provide: (i) quality, even at low bitrates, (ii) reliability, independent of loss patterns and (iii) interactivity (low perceived latency) ... to many users simultaneously. In this article, we will discuss various well-known technologies for streaming video over the Internet. We will look at how these technologies partially solve the aforementioned problems. Then, we will present and explain Multiple Description Coding – which offers a very good solution – and how it has been implemented and tested at STMicroelectronics.. |
|
| Quality of Service | |
| Network structures — the internet, IPTV
and QoS |
|
How would a broadcaster transmit TV transported over IP packets rather than using traditional broadcast methods? This article introduces a view of a generic Service Provider IP distribution system including DVB’s IP standard; a comparison of Internet and managed Service Provider IP video distribution; how a broadcaster can inject TV programming into the Internet and, finally, how to control the Quality of Experience of video in an IP network. |
|
| Spectrum Planning | |
| Spectrum Planning — analysis of methods
for the summation of Log-normal distributions |
|
When carrying out coverage predictions for RF signals, statistics play a big part and the statistical nature of the predicted values cannot be ignored. In the particular case of location variation, the signals are assumed to follow a log-normal distribution and various methods are available for carrying out summations of such signals. This article examines the different algorithms in an attempt to assess the suitability of each one and to identify the optimum method to use. Two main scenarios are considered. The first looks at the summation of a series of signals with various mean values, such as might be used when summing the contributions of a number of interferers. The second looks at the best method of including a constant such as the minimum field strength. In all cases, the impact of the mean level and standard deviation of the contributors is considered. |
|
| Exhibitions, Conventions etc | |
| IBC 2007— a glimpse into our technology
future |
|
The fortieth edition of IBC 2007 broke records, yet again. There were some 47,000 visitors and 1300 exhibitors from a total of 120 countries. There was plenty of innovation on display, even though some visitors thought it was a show about consolidation. Here, Nick Radlo points to some of the technology advances, new products and cross-industry initiatives he thinks it’s worth keeping an eye on. |
|
![]()
| Published
quarterly by the European Broadcasting Union ISSN: 1609-1469 |
|
| Editeur Responsable: | Lieven Vermaele |
| Editor-in-Chief: | Mike Meyer |
| French Editor: | Eric Piraux |
| Reproduction of articles in EBU Technical Review is authorized only with the prior consent of the Editor-in-Chief. | |
| The responsibility for views expressed in articles published in EBU Technical Review rests solely with the authors. | |
| European Broadcasting Union |
![]() |
| We also get a lot of unwanted spam. So if you would like to contact EBU Technical Review, please address an e-mail to techreview@ebu.ch – but insert an underscore between "tech" and "review", i.e.write it as "tech_review". | |