On July 24, 2003, the European Court of Justice laid down four
conditions that must be satisfied so that financial compensation,
which is intended to pay for public service obligations, is not
classified as State aid.
This decision may be of some importance in the public service
broadcasting sector where such funding compensates for fulfilment
of the public service remit.
Legislating on the case of a German transport company that had
not, contrary to another company, obtained licences and subsidies
for transporting passengers by bus, the Bundesverwaltungsgericht
(Federal Administrative Court) referred to the Court of Justice to
find out whether the subsidies granted to a company were considered
to be State aid prohibited by the EC Treaty.
The Court pointed out that for a State measure to be
classifiable as State aid within the meaning of the EC Treaty, it
must be capable of being regarded as an “advantage” conferred on
the recipient company that it would not have obtained under normal
market conditions.
The Court held that there is no such “advantage” where a State
financial measure must be regarded as compensation for the services
provided by the recipient company in order to discharge public
service obligations.
If these four conditions are satisfied, a company has not
enjoyed a real financial “advantage” which would have the effect of
putting it in a more favourable competitive position than the
companies competing with it, so that there is no case of State aid
within the meaning of the EC Treaty.
Reference : http://curia.eu.int/fr/actu/communiques/index.htm
Press releases 2003 :
Nº 64/2003: 24 July 2003 Judgment of the Court of Justice in
Case C-280/00 Altmark Trans et Regierungspräsidium
Magdeburg
For further information:
Jacques Briquemont
Head of Public Affairs,
Tel: +32 2 286 91 11
Mob: +32 475 84 02 45
briquemont@ebu.ch