The second day began with a debate on
"theme radio" led by Bernd Peter Arnold, ARD/HR.
 |
| Participants in the "theme radio" debate |
Talk programmes
Tibor Soltenszky, deputy head of the
literature and culture department at MR, said that talk radio was
not a great success in Hungary. The audience only listened to news
and art & culture information and turned off the radio
afterwards. This was no doubt due to the fact that in the past
radio programmes were politically biased, such as a weekend
cultural magazine that broadcast veiled extreme right-wing
propaganda. However, rising audience figures for literary and
artistic programmes made Tibor Soltenskzky optimistic that this
would change.
Young audiences
Beatriz Pécker, RNE, director of Radio 3,
believed that it was difficult to satisfy this audience as it was
constantly changing. Though 82% of 18–30-year-olds listened to the
radio, the majority of this segment listened to music. Confronted
with Internet competition for music, pubic radio had to offer more
than just the hit parade. Children had to be targeted in order to
give them a taste of radio, but unfortunately this was not done in
Spain. Radio 3 was neither a theme station nor a vehicle for hit
parades, but concentrated on risk-taking, identifying minority
styles, cultural information. Every day it also broadcast a
concert, for example Lou Reed, or a festival. Respect of the
audience is RNE's philosophy.
Marc Garcia, director of Le Mouv' at Radio
France, stated that young people were the first to abandon
general-interest stations. In order to try and win back the under
35-year-old listeners in 1997 Le Mouv' decided to dedicate 70% of
air time to music and the remaining time was given to information
presented in a younger format. NRJ, FUN and SKYROCK provide a vast
music offer (excluding classical music). In 1999 the format
changed: more rock, less French music. Since then, results had
improved in particular in the 15–34 age range.
Trends
Heinz Dieter Sommer, director of ARD/HR,
felt that market share had levelled out in Germany: radio had lost
ground and fallen to third place behind TV and newspaper
consumption, and in fourth place for young people who preferred the
Internet. The problem in Germany was that public radio was stuck
with "traditional categories". For example: even if SWR's four
stations had increased its audience share, it was still necessary
to think about niche radios: information, classical music, cultural
questions, sport, weather, road traffic, lifestyle. New formats had
to be considered and an open mind was necessary with regard to
conquering new markets in the future.
Local and regional radio
 |
| Participants in the "local and regional radio" debate |
Anne Sandelin of YLE moderated the debate,
which included presentations from Michel Meyer, director of France
Bleue, Radio France; Frans Leve, director of VRT; Malte Lind,
director of SR Vastmanland; Fredy Franzoni, strategic projects,
RSI; and Juan de la Peña, director of Radio 1 at RNE.
Michel Meyer believed that broadcasters
should not give up on general-interest radio stations. He put
forward another option for public radio caught between two opposing
forces, i.e. the integration of public service, the break up of the
private sector: regionalizing radio but keeping it in a network.
France Bleue, with its 43 regions, used a regional approach within
the framework of national Radio France.
Michel Meyer described the situation in
which radio found itself in as "globcal":
global understanding with a regional focus. To achieve this, France
Bleue had adopted a cascade structure: local, network, global view
of the world while at the same time able to surprise, to be useful
and relevant. Its seven audience-point lead proved that this
structure was working, and in the near future France Bleue was
aiming for a 10-point lead. It was symbolic that the last station
to be incorporated into this structure was the Paris station.
Frans Leven of VRT explained that for an
audience of 5 million listeners, there were five channels. The five
regional stations of Radio 2 offered both local programmes and
national windows. Seven times a day, Radio 2 broadcast local
information, it also maintained a local profile by having its
premises in the area and playing a role in local life. In the
future, this will be reinforced by hiring local people to work in
radio, the Net, television and later on news programmes, plus
creating identifiable jingles that correspond to each individual
local stations.
Malte Lind, director of Vastmanland (SR),
stated that the concept of formats had to be looked at. Why does a
Swede listen to 1 of 26 local radio stations? Despite the long
absence of competition, the emergence of new TV channels, the
Internet, etc, still had not dented the audience levels for radio.
Why? The reason for this was probably that despite an interest in
what was happening in the world the listener was still identifying
himself in relation to local information.
Fredy Franzoni believed that it was
important to define new radio spectrum. In view of transmission
problems due to the lie of the land, RSI reminded delegates of the
importance of transfrontier radios, sharing the same "local"
information (e.g. road traffic), and in view of new radio spectrum,
there was also the need to have a reform of the mechanism used to
allocate radio frequencies. It was now up to public service radio
to use this space.
For Juan de la Peña, director of Radio 1
(RNE), as listeners identify with local radio it is important to
pay attention to programming that answers listeners' questions. At
the same time local is moving onto satellite and the Internet and
programmes can now be heard around the world. In the information
age, local radio is faced with more challenges in an increasingly
complex world, financial imperatives, and the need to be profitable
(is this a trap?). Last but not least, local radio must give
listeners a feeling of sense and values.
 |
| Participants in the "arts and radio" debate |
Culture and radioChristian Maillard, director of
international affairs of Radio France opened the debat "Art and
Music on Radio".
Nicholas Kenyon, controller of BBC Proms
(for more, click here), live events and TV
classical music, asked "What is culture?" The Proms? Wimbledon?
There are two examples of re-adaption: over the past 20 years
cinema had changed and now showed films in a comfortable,
attractive setting, the Proms had also adapted and now added
interactivity to its offer thereby giving Internet users the
possibility to decided what the programme will be via Radio 3, a
Proms which reflected new cultures and which had a wider range of
music to appeal to today's audience. Radio had to be flexible and
rapidly adapt to new formats in order to give audiences before they
know they want it.
Olivier Kaeppelin, deputy director of
France Culture, said that culture had changed. Now it represented a
plurality of different worlds. Though mainstream art was still
present, the way it was broadcast was different as was the
appreciating culture. It was important to think about this. Olivier
Kaeppelin continued by saying that "zapping" was a cultural
phenomenon that was inherent in young people's sense of
freedom. Though art was not often discussed on radio, museums
were visited by over 15 million people a year and this was
something that could be followed up. Radio had to try to adapt and
re-examine its formats. It was important to recognize that culture
had to be presented in a format that corresponded to the station
and its audience: how about 10 broadcasts lasting 2 minutes
30 seconds each.
Fernand Argenta, director of Clasicos
Populares at RNE, couldn't really explain the success of the
programme but he believed that it depended on "putting
your heart and soul into what you do, being sincere and becoming a
friend of the family. Nothing has changed over the past 27 years in
my programme apart from the music and the audience."
 |
| Steve Robinson, vice-president, WFMT (Chicago) |
The closing session was the opportunity to hear the North-American
point of view from Steve Robinson, vice-president of WFMT
(Chicago), who gave an overview of culture in public stations in
the United States. Sylvain Lafrance, French radio and new media,
and vice-president of Radio Canada, reminded delegates that 98% of
Canadians listened to the radio. |
| Sylvain Lafrance, vice-president Radio Canada |
Canadian public radio was different from
commercial radio and was based on the values of democracy, cultural
diversity and quality. The fight for preserving culture was an
every day battle.
Radio is a public forum in a cyber space.
Sylvain Lafrance believed that radio had to be a local medium, and
not only in geographic terms. It had to accelerate exchanges among
different national cultures, who had to learn to live together.
Public broadcasters had to create the basis for this new
society.